-- the leading Battlefield 3 fan site, with news, updates, videos, screenshots, rumors, and more.
On March 16th, 2012 in News

Battlefield 3 conquest domination
Battlefield 3′s upcoming DLC, Close Quarters, includes four new maps, several new weapons, and a new game mode: Conquest Domination. Since Close Quarters maps are so small, the Rush mode won’t be supported. Instead, players will get to try out Conquest Domination, which is similar to the “Domination” mode from Unreal Tournament. Conquest Domination is suited for the small, infantry-focused maps of Close Quarters, and will rely on the spawn system from Team Deathmatch. DICE says about the new mode in a new blog post:

“In particular, flag defense is suddenly more important, and you get different tactical layers due to the subtle differences the new mode provides.”

Close Quarters will ship this June. Price is yet to be announced.


  1. petezahut12001
    March 16th, 2012 at 11:19 pm

    Hmmm… if the spawn system is based on the team deathmatch one, don’t forget to look behind you every 5 seconds.

    HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 95 Thumb down 4
    • ikillzombs
      March 16th, 2012 at 11:55 pm

      NOOOOOOO! F*** DICE and F*** EA. GIVE ME BACK MY D*** RUSH MODE! at least 16 players doesnt sound so bad for console . im going back to BC2

      Thumb up 16 Thumb down 81
      • Dumpster_cat
        March 17th, 2012 at 12:35 am

        dice is doing different things like this to attract diff one said you have to play the new maps or game mode so stop bitching

        HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 89 Thumb down 23
        • ikillzombs
          March 17th, 2012 at 2:25 am

          @dumpster cat i can bitch all i desire because i paid for the game expecting aggressive dlc, and when the 2nd dlc release in 8 months is a piece of s*** ripoff from cod (the name of the game mode is even from cod) you can bet i would be aggrovated. in fact, why dont we all bitch at dice and ea about leaving their long time consumers behind in favor for the cod crowd

          Thumb up 32 Thumb down 58
        • TEEhhEE bro
          March 18th, 2012 at 12:22 am

          @ikillzombs bro you spelled aggravated wrong and you said the b-word without censoring. Pce.

          Thumb up 2 Thumb down 13
        • BF3 Player
          March 19th, 2012 at 8:19 pm

          @ikillzombs You’re right. Because cod was the first game to ever use the word “domination” as a game mode. You know, because it doesn’t say in the article that it’s similar to Unreal Tournament’s mode. Should bf3 not have m16′s or any other gun that cod had in its game too? Guess not.

          HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
      • I Love BF3
        March 17th, 2012 at 2:01 am

        I would love for you to tell me how rush would work on these maps. Rush makes the map bigger every time a base is destroyed, but since the maps are so small, that’s impossible to do. I don’t understand how you weren’t able to figure that out…it’s basic common sense…

        HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 47 Thumb down 5
        • ikillzombs
          March 17th, 2012 at 2:14 am

          well they should install doors that open when a base is captured or have different floors for different bases, they dont need to just exclude rush from the new maps. in fact, on close quarters maps like metro and bazar on rush, ive observed a greater amount of teamwork than on any of the other game modes

          HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 37 Thumb down 8
        • I Love BF3
          March 17th, 2012 at 3:51 am

          Yeah, but then it wouldn’t be close quarters. Sure, it’d still be confined, but the maps would still be big, and they don’t want that with this DLC. They’re appealing to everybody, stop bitching. Yes, i know EA/DICE lied about the aggressive DLC plan, and yes, I know they’re not the best right now, but just be happy you’re getting something. If you’re not happy, then don’t buy it, simple as that. No need to continuously complain.

          Thumb up 15 Thumb down 11
        • Ahdhd
          March 19th, 2012 at 2:23 am

          Would you stop with the “stop bitching.” You’re a complete hypocrite every time you say that. What you really mean is “Stop voicing your contrasting opinion.” We don’t live in a fluffy world where every discussion is always positive.

          Thumb up 7 Thumb down 2
      • LythosX
        March 17th, 2012 at 11:17 pm

        Please go back to BF2 so we don’t have to listen to you whine. If DICE catered to fools like you, we’d never see any groundbreaking gameplay. The great thing about BF3 is its incredible variety, and these upcoming DLC’s only follow that line of thought. Don’t be short-sighted and make easy comparisons to MW3 — Close Quarters will eclipse that, and be a lot of fun. After that we’ll get vehicles, and after that who knows what. But one thing I’m sure of is that your opinion is nothing more than that, and only reflects the folks that we probably always mute in-game. Get a life.

        Thumb up 10 Thumb down 13
        • Implied
          March 18th, 2012 at 4:16 am

          Wow, you seriously have no idea what you’re talking about do you? Rush is a Bad Company Game Mode. If DICE was catering exclusively to the BF2 Crowd, first off, you most likely wouldn’t be here, and secondly, we wouldn’t have Rush either, so he wouldn’t be here either.

          Thumb up 13 Thumb down 6
        • Implied
          March 18th, 2012 at 4:24 am

          P.S. “groundbreaking gameplay” I’m not quite sure what you’re calling groundbreaking, but BF3 is not Groundbreaking. Battlefield 1942 was groundbreaking. The Multi-Player it provided was unique. Battlefield 2 was slightly groundbreaking, introducing new features etc. Battlefield 3 is not groundbreaking. In any way. It was great, now its good, but its not innovating the FPS market with anything that hasn’t been done before, either by them or by someone else.

          HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 13 Thumb down 5
    • Colt_Gun
      March 17th, 2012 at 12:54 am

      You’d think DICE would at least try to be subtle when they completely rip a game mode from Call of Duty… Whats next? “Squad Search and Destroy”?

      Seriously, if I have to put up with TDM spawns while I play these maps DICE needs to fix them or I will not buy it.

      Thumb up 25 Thumb down 33
    • Implied
      March 17th, 2012 at 2:10 am

      Double Domination isn’t a CoD Game Mode, it can be found in both UT2003 and UT2004, its more of an “Old School Shooter” Mode tbh. At the least, yes, it can definitely be tagged as “Arcade”, but its not a CoD: MW creation.

      Reading the blog post though, I came across some interesting statements
      “The closest you come to this type of tight combat scenario in Battlefield 3 is on Operation Métro. We know this is one of our most popular maps” –
      I wonder what kind of Statistics are possibly telling him that, all the Conquest Rotations I’ve ever done have excluded it completely. They do seem to want to sell this as a “Conquest” Mode after all, so I doubt they’re looking at say, Rush Statistics are they? >.>

      In another part right after that, they get into details about “really, really small pieces” so I guess Micro Destruction is confirmed as the “HD Destruction” feature we’ve been told about. They were inspired by the Matrix Lobby shoot-up scene. Good Movie.

      On the TDM Spawning – BF3 TDM Spawning works with fixed locations chosen by a Menu by the Player, meaning this DD Mode won’t be featuring the same Spawning System as UT2004 DD, but it’ll quite likely end up working out.

      “Creating my own HD Destruction timelapse video” – Hm. BattleRecorder?

      I need to add this much to the end though – Double Domination was created for a completely different type of Game compared to Battlefield. To make it work on here they’ll have to do some Modifications, for example, to the Weapon line-ups – First couple of Comments are pointing out something important –
      “Neo and Trinity didn’t have RPGs. If you removed all explosives in this game mode, it could be a lot of fun. But as long as there is RPGs and grenade launchers, I just don’t see this being fun.”
      “This game mode has the potential to get spammy. Please remove rpg, smaw, m320 etc, it will be like metro all over, it just isn´t fun to play anymore. Make it tactical please! I don’t want to spawn and take a step to die.”

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 79 Thumb down 4
      • Manlove
        March 17th, 2012 at 2:24 am

        5 star post, chap.

        HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 21 Thumb down 2
        March 17th, 2012 at 3:31 am

        If I can move like Neo to avoid get shot by a rpg, I’ll play it then! Slow me down Matrix style instead of getting suppressed? Game on!

        I really like ur idea on no rockets or noobtubes. Could make a clusterfuck actually fun and less clusterfucky……yes, I said clusterfucky

        HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 25 Thumb down 3
      • Implied
        March 17th, 2012 at 3:55 am

        To expand, also in reply to some other Posts here –

        - There won’t be Vehicles. Far too small. Plus, its indoors. Maybe something funny like a Mail Cart or something (they did have that Forklift in BtK) but no Choppers, Tanks, Jets, etc. No.

        - The TDM Spawn System should allow you to choose where you want to Spawn, difference with Conquest Classic is your options are more limited. Options may change depending on if you control which Objective however, which will add to the List. Ensuring someone doesn’t spawn behind you however will likely be entirely up to you being in the right place.

        - Far as how Tickets will work, I think YouAreTheOneNeo has it down. In UT2K DD you need to hold both Objectives for a set period of time in order to score. In CQD you’ll probably hold them to raise your Ticket count up until a set cap. Could also be you don’t lose any Tickets as long as you hold both Objectives, but I think the first is more likely.

        - Likely it’ll stick to 2 Objectives on both Consoles and PCs due to the small amount of Players. They might experiment with 3, but 3 would probably feel weird and likely be too much for 8v8.

        - Quick Scoping may also be a potential issue, along with Explosives and RPGs… >..< If it helps, ignore the "Conquest" label they're sticking to it. Think of it as just good old Double Domination, but modified.

        HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 16 Thumb down 2
      • juju
        March 17th, 2012 at 4:10 am

        isn’t the m320 going to get a nerf in the next patch?

        Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
      • Ken J
        March 17th, 2012 at 2:04 pm

        Actually, there are a ton of 24/7 Operation Metro high ticket 64 player servers out there for one reason only. PPM. Even if you’re on the losing team your PPM will be better than playing in any other mode. So there are a ton of these servers out there for people who want to rank up fast… So their statistics of that being one of the most popular maps is correct.

        HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0
        • Implied
          March 18th, 2012 at 4:28 am

          Oh. Oops. I always Filter it out >.< +1 for All Game Modes All Maps then I guess :|

          Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1
      • CuS
        April 26th, 2012 at 1:06 pm

        I don’t think Conquest Domination is going to be anything like Double Dom, but they were probably referring to Domination from UT’99
        Also, I think most people have forgotten that the DLC is going to have 16 players max, none of that 64 player Metro clusterfuck

        (PS: UT forever :D )

        Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • GuerillaMatzilla
      March 23rd, 2012 at 6:01 pm

      Why the f would they use team deathmatch spawn system? At least you can spawn on squad mates in squad death match! I hope they are at least tweaking team deathmatch to allow squad spawning, otherwise… what a fail

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  2. niklas
    March 16th, 2012 at 11:21 pm

    second comment yes!!

    Thumb up 6 Thumb down 44
    • Asgaro
      March 17th, 2012 at 12:45 am

      Let’s have a toast, fellas!

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 42 Thumb down 3
      • Your Friendly Neighborhood Poster
        March 17th, 2012 at 1:19 am

        PC manufacturers need to arm their computers with something that kicks the user in the balls every time they type “first comment!”

        HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 55 Thumb down 6
        • Kmanblazzer
          March 17th, 2012 at 3:19 am

          Funny moment when you has a Mac

          Thumb up 7 Thumb down 10
        • Jackson
          March 17th, 2012 at 4:12 am

          tdm spawns not only mean random spawns but no squad spawns. this is one of the main reasons i play and love bf3. two designated spawn zones and teamwork. tdm spawns support neither of these components. i think the metro can be fun. but tdm? i hate it. this is the reason i wont buy this map pack

          Thumb up 7 Thumb down 1
    • BF2=THE BEST
      March 17th, 2012 at 7:19 am

      for real god i h8 ppl who say that & btw dumb ass ur not the 2nd comment ur like the 10th! -_- also i am looking forward to this because i like tight intense maps bullets flying everywhere explosions crazy things happen i think its fun op metro is a nice map i also love jets & tanks so armored kill better be the opposite of this dlc close quarters is small maps & armored kill big maps? i sure hope so & armored kill better have jets! just my opinion. & guys when does close quarters come out?

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 11
  3. That brown kid
    March 16th, 2012 at 11:23 pm


    Thumb up 15 Thumb down 42
  4. Command3rJugs
    March 16th, 2012 at 11:24 pm

    I really like this idea :D I always loved unreal on the pc. so lets see if it turns out great like my dreams are sayin.

    HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 19 Thumb down 3
  5. Alpha
    March 16th, 2012 at 11:26 pm

    Would really like for TDM spawns to be fixed 1st..

    HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 32 Thumb down 2
  6. sphinx2000
    March 16th, 2012 at 11:28 pm

    But, 16 player limit… bleh.

    Thumb up 19 Thumb down 17
    • Implied
      March 17th, 2012 at 9:43 am

      Yeah, that’s one unfortunate short coming. They want to make small in-door Maps, the unfortunate side-effect being they’re too small even for 24 Players :(

      Thumb up 8 Thumb down 1
    • Dodek
      March 17th, 2012 at 1:00 pm

      64 players on 50 meters squared FTW

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 12 Thumb down 1
  7. FPSErick
    March 16th, 2012 at 11:38 pm

    Not buyin till I get meh FUCKING patch first

    HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 28 Thumb down 7
    • Dumpster_cat
      March 17th, 2012 at 12:36 am

      the patch comes before map relase

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 33 Thumb down 0
      • phill
        March 17th, 2012 at 7:20 am

        yeah 5 minutes before the DLC

        HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 17 Thumb down 5
  8. TheLordVoldemort
    March 16th, 2012 at 11:46 pm

    Anyone else get the feeling this will be some sort of Capture the Flag style of gameplay?

    Other than having only 1, 2 or 3 flags, how could it be different from regular Conquest (other than size)?

    HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 22 Thumb down 2
    • YouAreTheOneNeo
      March 17th, 2012 at 12:23 am

      If it’s similar to Unreal Tournament then I imagine the team gains tickets while players are in the control point radius, the first team to 150 tickets wins or something.

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 16 Thumb down 1
      • BfFan
        March 17th, 2012 at 3:59 am

        wouldn’t that just encourage camping?

        HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 15 Thumb down 3
        • THE_FUN_POLICE_
          March 17th, 2012 at 4:36 am

          Making maps to get the COD crowd to BF3 will encourage camping.

          I dont know if you played MW3 or not, but the maps are small, and crammed full of shit that basically funnels players to certain areas. Thats why so many cod players (not all) will stick to one area and wait for someone to run to you. In COD, you can stick to one part of the map and get kills. Thats why I like BF3 over MW3. If you sit in one spot, you wont get much action….unless your playing Conquest Metro style.

          These new maps will be played like COD with COD players. Therefor just making camping and rocket/noobtube spamming inevitable. Keep COD COD and BF3 BF3. Thats why so many people prefer 1 over the other. I doubt anyone wants the 2 blended together

          HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 16 Thumb down 4
        • Ahdhd
          March 19th, 2012 at 6:17 am

          @The_Fun_Police Excellent post. Exactly how I feel about it.

          I’ll most likely pass on this DLC, unless it’s really cheap, because it seems like we’re getting skimped. I don’t see why the smaller game modes like TDM wouldn’t have sufficed for close quarters action. The buildings could have been one base in Rush, and then treated exactly the same for TDM. It just seems like they wanted to get DLC out quickly, so they cranked up the Destruction and called it “variety.”

          Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
  9. Your Friendly Neighborhood Poster
    March 16th, 2012 at 11:52 pm

    I know players want something different (obviously), and I couldn’t blame them even if I tried…but people need to keep in mind what DICE is trying to do.

    DICE in a question & answer during BF3 development stated that BF2 was designed as a “play our way or don’t play at all.” DICE went on to say that with Battlefield 3, they were aiming to get themselves away from that “our way or the highway” with Battlefield 3. They basically designed BF3 to appeal to a wider player base.

    This DLC is designed to appeal to the people who like this type of game play, and to give Battlefield something new and different. Do the majority of us like it? No. But some people do.

    If you don’t like it, then it’s understandable, but keep in mind that Armored Kill is going to be the next DLC, and End Game most likely won’t feature something like this.

    In the end, DICE is just trying to give a little something to everyone.

    HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 54 Thumb down 4
    • 82
      March 17th, 2012 at 1:46 am

      Again you’re right, its new blood put into the game. Some people will get it just for the guns or to just try it out. Some will like it, others not so much.
      What I want. Like I said in another post once.

      A map filter, whether it be choice of specific maps or size. If I get this and don’t like some of the maps then I don’t want to have to back out of a match when, If I end up with good teammates. I always end up having to leave a game when I get into a map I dislike.

      Just a map filter, is all I ask.

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 20 Thumb down 4
      • DemonAlpaca
        March 22nd, 2012 at 2:47 pm

        Since the dlc maps are 8v8 if you join a 12v12 game the map rotation can’t include a 8v8 map, so it works out in the end.

        Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  10. Sedargo
    March 16th, 2012 at 11:57 pm

    Nice to see they’re making game modes that fit the maps! I wonder if Armored Kill will bring the Combat Mission game mode from MoH 2010…

    HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 19 Thumb down 1
  11. Your Friendly Neighborhood Poster
    March 16th, 2012 at 11:58 pm

    More on topic from my last post;

    I really wish they weren’t going with the TDM style spawning system. If the maps were designed right, they could use a normal conquest spawning system…a TDM spawn system simply doesn’t seem very ideal for flag defense games, but I suppose that’s why “flag defense is suddenly more important”

    HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 11 Thumb down 3
    • YouAreTheOneNeo
      March 17th, 2012 at 12:29 am

      I actually wouldn’t mind the TDM spawning system IF and ONLY IF they fix 2 things. Spawn protection time needs to be 3 or 4 seconds if you don’t move or shoot. And no spawning in peoples damn iron sights.

      If they limit spawning to areas where your team has control or a small area at either end of the map then yeah, it could work. If it really is more like UT than CoD then I think I might actually enjoy this, but only if i’m playing on a server with autoadmin rules of No RPG / M320 and No Shotguns.

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 16 Thumb down 0
      • i still havent played bf3
        March 17th, 2012 at 4:43 pm

        Why take explosives away though? That will make it more intense. When I would play UT2004 DD.. some one would use the Redeemer and everyone would be screwed.. but it didn’t mean fun stopped. Now picture this in your head. You are playing one of the maps here and your capturing the flag. If someone starts to shoot RPGs then you gotta change your strategy. In mist of all the action you gotta be ready for the threat approaching. If you take the enemy down then success but if not then try again.

        Thumb up 1 Thumb down 9
  12. BFtastic
    March 17th, 2012 at 12:01 am

    Still have no idea what Conquest Domination was all about. Surprised that the leaked info of BF Evolved is up here on bf3blog.

    HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 12 Thumb down 2
    • BFtastic
      March 17th, 2012 at 12:02 am


      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 9 Thumb down 1
  13. kelleroid
    March 17th, 2012 at 12:02 am

    Conquest but in a single building and with random spawns.


    HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 17 Thumb down 3
  14. b0Ss
    March 17th, 2012 at 12:03 am

    Just like with Conquest Assault, they should make this Conquest Domination a separate game mode that can be selected as its own game type, as opposed to mixing it in with the standard Conquest mode. At least make some servers with only Conquest, Conquest Assault, etc.

    Alternatively, allow all maps support the Assault and Domination variant in the Conquest game mode, and not just maps to their respective DLC. For example, there should be a Conquest Assault mode for Caspian Border, and Conquest Domination for Metro.

    HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 18 Thumb down 0
  15. theawesometaco
    March 17th, 2012 at 12:10 am

    Wow asked for cq or rush hope it will include one or two vehicles :) in the trailer for it did anyone else see the helicopter at 00:43 it is not in the background spool who knows (apart from dice) ???

    Thumb up 8 Thumb down 2
    • theawesometaco
      March 17th, 2012 at 12:24 am

      Not sayin I’m not lookin forward to it tho lol *soooo not spool :D

      Thumb up 2 Thumb down 2
  16. Vespucci
    March 17th, 2012 at 12:15 am

    I hope they make assault and domination separate. As for the dlc I hope that some of these maps wont be more clusterfucky than Metro already is.

    Thumb up 7 Thumb down 2
  17. Pierogi210
    March 17th, 2012 at 12:16 am

    For those who say this sucks, dice sucks, etc, remember that no one is loosing any content. You’re only gaining more if you decide to buy this 2nd dlc. If you dont’ like it, don’t buy it and dont’ judge it when you haven’t seen everything about it or played it.

    HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 18 Thumb down 5
    • Luck7
      March 18th, 2012 at 3:18 pm

      I hope the close quarters dlc sells extremely well. This way DICE will continue making small maps, and take out vehicle warfare.

      Then I will laugh as the Battlefield series is nothing more than another COD clone that sucks anyways. Hahahahahah

      Thumb up 1 Thumb down 5
  18. jakt
    March 17th, 2012 at 12:34 am

    Conquest Domination sounds like Conquest Assault?

    HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
    • jakt
      March 17th, 2012 at 12:56 am

      Looks like the only difference is we won’t have the choice of what flag to spawn on.

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0
  19. ..
    March 17th, 2012 at 12:37 am

    If the map pack is so fucking bad, why people worry about it. No one forces you to buy it. If You don’t like it, you shouldn’t spend money on it. If it really is that bad, I ain’t gonna buy it either. Simple, ha?

    Thumb up 12 Thumb down 6
    • John
      March 17th, 2012 at 1:52 pm

      Pc players play and rent 64 player servers

      A 16 player map pack really fucks us off frankly
      Especially those renting 64 slot servers

      How the fuck are they Going to run this map pack
      They should have built bigger versions of this and scaled down to suit the consoles
      It’s bad news for pc players and Fukin bad news for those renting 64 slot servers
      So much for pc being the main platform and the “aggressive” DLC program
      Promised (for pc players) was a blatant Fukin lie

      Thumb up 1 Thumb down 4
  20. Evanx125
    March 17th, 2012 at 12:58 am

    HAHAHA, CONQUEST shouldn’t even be in the same sentence as close quarters, what? We’re going to rulers with construction paper as the flag?Really?what a clusterfuck that’s going to be.
    Rant over.
    Yes, I said rant over.

    Thumb up 8 Thumb down 8
  21. Ol Ron Reagan
    March 17th, 2012 at 1:30 am

    Really?….. I swear EA/Dice whomsoevers idea this was… is butthurt that CoD sold more… Its obvious. So now theyre gonna try and duplicate CoD… I don’t wanna live on this world anymore….

    Thumb up 7 Thumb down 16
    • DarKKaramel
      March 17th, 2012 at 9:12 pm

      CoD is always going sell more because it’s bought by the average consumer and the average consumer is an idiot.

      Thumb up 7 Thumb down 2
  22. Indi
    March 17th, 2012 at 2:18 am

    Lets just say that its Basically a CoD DLC, Only with Frostbite 2.0 graphics destruction and gameplay!
    Hence why im not buying it!

    Thumb up 3 Thumb down 19
  23. Yoshi
    March 17th, 2012 at 3:15 am

    LOLOL Close quarters like COD? PShhh keep dreaming whoever said that…

    …It basically reflects some of the CO-OP / Campaign missions given in BF3. However they just made it so its a mode for multiplayer.

    Furthermore, i reckon they should chuck in CTF soon :)

    Thumb up 4 Thumb down 6
  24. j35t3r
    March 17th, 2012 at 3:23 am

    to all the neg bozos this game is still the best game play an graphics wise as far as fps go even with its bugs u tossers act like spoilt children tell me an fps that doesnt have bugs and looks this good and ill get it but hey there isnt one is there go play skyrim or cod and fuck off if u dont like it or take ur game back to where u perchased it and get ur cash back simple

    Thumb up 6 Thumb down 6
    • luis
      March 18th, 2012 at 6:38 pm

      you are an idiot, returning the game would bring back less than half what you payed for. Best game out? No, not by a long shot. You were close cause you said skyrim and that beats bf3 easily. They should of released close quarter last since hey most of the maps are close quarter.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
      • j35t3r
        March 20th, 2012 at 8:48 pm

        i said best fps not game you retard and consols only get half back and being a consol player that is what you deserve for being dumb enough to get one

        Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
  25. The_dark_knight_rises
    March 17th, 2012 at 3:30 am


    Thumb up 3 Thumb down 3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>