-- the leading Battlefield 3 fan site, with news, updates, videos, screenshots, rumors, and more.
On November 6th, 2011 in News

BF3 xbox 360Recently, EA announced that Battlefield 3 had sold 5 million copies during its first week, an impressive number even for an AAA game. Now additional data from third party sales trackers reveals the breakdown of the sales, i.e. how many units were sold on each platform, in approximate numbers.

It’s clear that the Xbox 360 version of Battlefield 3 has taken a considerable lead, outselling the PlayStation 3 and PC versions by a huge margin. In fact, the Xbox 360 version outsold the PS3 and PC versions combined.

  • Xbox 360: 2.2 million
  • PlayStation 3: 1.5 million
  • PC: 500,000

The numbers aren’t 100% accurate as some digital retailers, including EA’s Origin, haven’t disclosed their sales numbers, so it’s likely that the numbers for the PC version are higher than reported. Just after Battlefield 3 shipped, EA reported that 10 million units were shipped.


  1. The Battlefield Guro
    November 6th, 2011 at 12:16 am

    How ironic how the console that gets the best version of COD buys the most copies of Bf3. :D

    HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 45 Thumb down 3
    • BF3FTW!
      November 6th, 2011 at 3:55 am

      I mean its still awesome to know that it made a lot of the sales.Its still weird how PC is the lowest. I honestly thought the majority of sales would come from the PC.

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 29 Thumb down 4
      • Kierenblade
        November 6th, 2011 at 6:27 am

        I thought so as well, but I must say, I’m impressed!

        Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
      • liar
        November 6th, 2011 at 7:08 pm

        This isn’t great news for pc gamers who want future BF games to be developed on PC first, then ported to consoles. Dice revealed that PC wasn’t the lead this time around. And now with consoles leading sales, don’t expect to ever see a pc lead BF game ever again.

        Thumb up 16 Thumb down 9
        • Implied
          November 7th, 2011 at 1:51 am

          *Hand on Shoulder* I feel for you mate… You must have a sad life, seeing as you’re so delusional. I feel for you….

          Thumb up 2 Thumb down 14
      • Cal
        November 6th, 2011 at 9:49 pm

        Dude did you not read? EA Origin sales are not counted in, 90% of the PC gaming market is Digital. No Origin sales means that none of the digital PC purchases were counted in with this chart. For a few years now PC has been leading in the digital sales market, that’s why hardly any retail stores have PC games anymore, it’s all digital, which means our PC numbers have to be well into the millions. This was purely Retail (physical discs).

        Thumb up 11 Thumb down 7
        • liar
          November 6th, 2011 at 11:06 pm

          Yeah I read that. I don’t think that’s going to make up the difference of the combined total of xbox/ps3. Even if it comes close or even slightly edges it, I think consoles are going to end up being the lead from now on. It’s good news for console gamers who want stuff tailor-made for them, but for pc users that have beasty machines and want their games to take full advantage, it sorta sucks.

          Thumb up 2 Thumb down 4
        • Implied
          November 7th, 2011 at 1:49 am

          “I think consoles are going to end up being the lead from now on.”

          How do you figure that exactly? IIRC BC2′s PC Sales ended up beating out the Console ones, and they developed for PC + Console side-by-side. DICE has said that developing for PC first gives them an edge, why would they sacrifice that edge?

          Thumb up 6 Thumb down 6
        • liar
          November 7th, 2011 at 3:01 am

          Why would they give up that edge? Because they already did with BF3. Dice has already admitted that PC was NOT the lead. I’m making a very small point that people seem to really not like, understandably. Some seem to be in denial though too. PC was not the lead for BF3; all I’m saying is given how strong the console sales are, Dice will probably continue to develop future games on consoles as lead.

          It’s not like I’m saying the PC version sucks; it’s awesome. And I’m not guessing that consoles were the lead for BF3; Dice already admitted they were the lead. So that’s not really up for debate. Lesson seems to be that you can lead on console and still make a great PC game. Just saying enthusiasts of the PC variety won’t like that news too much. And you can bet EA will push for console lead development after crunching these numbers.

          Thumb up 4 Thumb down 7
        • Implied
          November 7th, 2011 at 4:24 am

          It never ceases to amaze me how Fanboys mis-understand everything, or maybe just twist it on purpose to suit their own needs. Or idk, maybe you’re really that stupid. If anything though, you’re definitely in denial. Try re-reading the Article, and this time, don’t stop half-way through, or disregard what doesn’t suit your Fanboy-ism.

          DICE gave up the edge because they didn’t have enough time. They clearly said so. Or did your Fanboy Brain disregard that part in an attempt to gain more Epeen? EA wanted to get this out before MW3 in a desperate attempt to steal some Sales from it. If they had the choice, they’d have more than willingly stayed with PC Lead if they could, as it was before.

          “And you can bet EA will push for console lead development after crunching these numbers.”

          You’re throwing around assumptions with over 1 Million un-accounted for Sales. Could you get any more horrible at this?

          Here’s some actual facts on the other hand: EA/DICE released Beta Stats, over 8.1 Million Users. And yet, in 1st Week Sales, only 5 Million. So here’s my question to EA’s Bullshit Beta – Where’d those other 3 Million go? There’s no way those 3 Million all represent Medal of Honor Pre-Orders who tried the Beta but didn’t end up buying BF3. EA’s CoD Wanna-Be Beta actually pushed people to cancel their Pre-Orders. They want good Sales so badly? Then they should back off of DICE and let them do their own thing. Big time, and since you seem to be keen on making up your own Facts, here’s some real Facts: DICE LOVES PC-Lead, and if given the opportunity, they will ALWAYS go PC Lead. So troll on.

          The fact that it wasn’t even on Steam didn’t exactly help matters either, with EA Calculating 100K Sales lost from the lack of Steam. Fanboys at work once again…. Also, since you seem to have ignored this as well, as someone pointed out in an older Article, while BC2 originally sold more on Consoles, over time, the PC Sales overtook the Console Numbers. Yeah, Console Lead. Keep dreaming.

          Thumb up 8 Thumb down 8
      • liar
        November 7th, 2011 at 5:25 am

        I don’t know what you’re even disagreeing about. Nor do I understand what kind of fanboyism you’re accusing me of. Nothing I’ve said is bias. Sure they ran out of time; and that’s why they originally put consoles as lead for BF3. And?

        With the very strong sales of consoles I think they’ll end up continuing this way of lead developing EVEN IF PC sales end up more than consoles. I’m not even saying PC won’t pass consoles. They may. So what? Console sales are strong enough I think DICE will end up, even if pushed by EA because publishers like efficient release dates, putting consoles as lead.

        Not sure why you’re sooooo upset over just an opinion on what I think DICE will do for future games based on very strong console sales.

        Thumb up 1 Thumb down 4
        • Implied
          November 7th, 2011 at 7:07 am

          “and that’s why they originally put consoles as lead for BF3. ”
          You don’t even understand what you’re reading. Its amazing. They didn’t plan this originally. They started on PC, originally, it was all on PC. Then, at some point in the middle of it all, they found out they didn’t have enough time, so they switched to Console Lead. You really didn’t read the Article, or the Quote did you? Amazing.

          So, first you say “And you can bet EA will push for console lead development after crunching these numbers.” Then you say “With the very strong sales of consoles I think they’ll end up continuing this way of lead developing EVEN IF PC sales end up more than consoles.”

          Really? So where’s the reasoning in that? PC Sells more in the Long-Term, but its the worse choice for Lead because, what? Console sells more in the 1st Week? As I already said above, apparently you didn’t read that bit – EA has to back off DICE, a lot. They bombed the Beta, they caused obvious massive Pre-Order losses with their CoD Wanna-Be. If anything, EA should do what Publishers used to do before they started buying out and Money Milking every Studio they could – get back to Publishing, not trying, and failing, pathetically, at Developing.

          “based on very strong console sales.”
          Based on Week 1 Sales who’s Platform Sales Numbers aren’t even complete. Now what do you think EA cares more about, weak Week 1 Sales, or strong Long-Term Sales, which will overall generate more profits for them to line their thickly padded pockets with?

          Thumb up 2 Thumb down 6
        • liar
          November 7th, 2011 at 8:03 am

          Hehe settle down. Take a pill. I know console lead wasn’t their plan originally. They switch because of wanting to hit a release date. That will only be pushed more in the future by their publisher. The fact that consoles have had strong sales means this will only encourage it more. Not very hard to comprehend. (Consoles could stop selling copies at this point and still be considered strong sales. So I’ll grant you MUCH better PC sales. I’m guessing it still happens that consoles take lead in the future). Meeting release dates, which publishers push, and will continue to push now that consoles are doing very well and a success even if they sold zero copies from here on out, is enough of an edge, at least it was this time around. So I don’t see a reason to think they’ll give up THAT edge. They may of course, but i’m thinking the strong console sales enourage that.

          Is that really such a butt hurt issue for you?

          Apparently that really hits a nerve with you.

          Thumb up 4 Thumb down 2
        • liar
          November 7th, 2011 at 8:07 am

          You said “console lead. keep dreaming”. heh we’re living the dream right now with BF3. So surely someone thinking future BF games leading on console isn’t that crazy.

          Times change. Roll with it. You’ll enjoy life more.

          Thumb up 4 Thumb down 5
        • Implied
          November 7th, 2011 at 9:32 am

          Once again, you seem to have missed the point. EA bombed Battlefield 3 sales. Its obvious to anyone who looks closely. Of course, EA themselves might ignore this, since they’re Childish idiots, but who knows. DICE might just slap it in their face, in which case they might decide to let the actual Developers do the Developing.

          Fact is, EA cares about what will get EA the most cash, and judging by BC2 Sales, PC will, in the long run, bring in the most Cash. Sure, in the Short-Run, Consoles might sell more, but what’s more tempting to EA, and EA’s Investors, a few Million Dollars made in the first week, or Double-Digit Millions made in the Long-Run? You do the math.

          Investors like to see Quarterly Earnings. If PC brings in more Quarterly Earnings than Consoles, EA will prefer to shift Lead Platform Focus to PC, because the PC keeps their Quarterly Earnings high, which in turn keeps Investors coming in. If PC initially sells more, and then Consoles keep the Quarterly Earnings high, then EA will want to shift focus towards Consoles, which in turn will keep Investors investing. Its not just about what gets you the highest Week 1 Sales, Week 1 Sales only boost 1 Quarterly Earnings Report. If for the other 3 Quarters of the Year you have bad Quarterly Earnings Reports, then Investors won’t be interested in doing Long-Term Investments with your Company.

          EA has made some ridiculously idiotic decisions with meddling in BF3 Developing, but they’re still a very large Corporation, bringing in huge profits, so I’m quite sure they must have been doing something right to keep themselves afloat all this time. Hopefully one day they’ll start to learn from their mistakes though, and hopefully they won’t parade the Week 1 Sales around as proof that their Marketing Strategy works, otherwise, goodbye BF4, hello BC4.

          Sure, then someone could ask “Why is Console the primary focus of so many Studios then?” Because its easy money. Developing for Consoles is a lot easier than developing and supporting a PC Game. For one, the Hardware is all the same, so you just need to make sure it runs at 60 Frames and you’re set. Second, if the Game takes off, you can pump it full of 10$ DLCs and people will trip over themselves in their haste to get their hands on more content. All you need to do as the Dev Studio is sit back and profit, no need to worry about Fancy Graphics and stuff like DX11 Toolset. I’ll repeat myself – Tessellation + DX11 will hit Console Devs in the face like a Brick Wall when Next-Gen Consoles Launch. And its going to be hilarious.

          Thumb up 3 Thumb down 7
      • That one guy
        November 7th, 2011 at 11:29 am

        Remember kryptonite from “kick ass”? what if they upgraded the tactical light with it

        Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • Anooo
      November 25th, 2011 at 7:54 pm

      Actually, this does not include digital buys (which always make up the larger percentage of PC sales), so it’s not very accurate.

      Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  2. TruthSlayer
    November 6th, 2011 at 12:18 am

    Congrats to my little XBOX360 brothers. And when I say little, I mean twelve year olds screaming into the microphone with a mouthful of dinosaur shaped chicken nuggets.

    Warmest regards,
    BF3 PC

    HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 79 Thumb down 68
    • Damascus
      November 6th, 2011 at 12:35 am

      I was 19 last I checked, but whatever “big bro”

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 77 Thumb down 15
      • Binksss
        November 6th, 2011 at 12:52 am

        Ouh that’s really old!

        Thumb up 8 Thumb down 44
      • Lolwut
        November 8th, 2011 at 8:36 pm

        LOL. Even worse.

        Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
    • Medic
      November 6th, 2011 at 2:35 am


      Thumb up 16 Thumb down 43
      • Implied
        November 6th, 2011 at 3:02 am

        The fact that you took time out of your life to say that puts a smile on my face.

        Because now I get to ridicule you for not having a life. :)

        Thumb up 24 Thumb down 25
        • Medic
          November 6th, 2011 at 4:29 am

          Saying “pclolololol makes me not have a life? are you usually this stupid or is today a special occasion?

          HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 27 Thumb down 18
        • Implied
          November 6th, 2011 at 4:46 am

          The fact that you took time out of your life to actually think up and write that proves A. You have no life, B. You’re an immature Fanboy.

          The fact that you didn’t understand my comment also makes me want to add C. You’re stupid.

          Thumb up 16 Thumb down 29
        • Medic
          November 6th, 2011 at 5:59 am

          You call me an immature fanboy while defending the immature fanboy I was responding to….which makes YOU an immature fanboy as well. welcome to the club :]

          HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 27 Thumb down 11
        • Implied
          November 6th, 2011 at 6:59 am

          Actually its more like he’s stating the truth. Xbox Community is filled with immature 12 year olds, like you.

          Thumb up 15 Thumb down 29
        • Medic
          November 6th, 2011 at 8:05 am

          Your logic is lame, I’m gonna go play my awesome xbox game. I suggest you do the same. You PC players make me sick, but trolling you gives me a kick. I’m sure glad xbox was my pick!

          Thumb up 16 Thumb down 22
        • Tummynator
          November 6th, 2011 at 9:27 am

          wow .. thats what you guys learn in middle school?? haha jk bro .. stop generalizing every platform … both of you!!!

          HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 25 Thumb down 1
      • PuddleofAIDS
        November 6th, 2011 at 6:36 am

        It’s funny because if you actually read you would understand that digital sales arent included in this article for PC. It seems that you are too ignorant to realize that digital makes up for most of the sales on pc.

        Thumb up 4 Thumb down 3
    • backy
      November 6th, 2011 at 9:35 am

      Damn you guys are immature. Well, im 21 and been playing on pc and FU*K! I’ve never seen this many hackers in any other fps game so far(and yes, from the day 1 after the release) well, I guess I have to be glad that PB is working… sorta. Im seriously planning on moving to consoles..

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 10 Thumb down 1
    • mm
      November 6th, 2011 at 4:02 pm

      Seems like you guys are starting it.. again. :P

      Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1
  3. Cruiseshipfan
    November 6th, 2011 at 12:22 am

    So the platform it looks worst in, has sold the most. Plus the Xbox is crap in general.

    Thumb up 50 Thumb down 62
    • ImStalkinYou
      November 6th, 2011 at 12:25 am

      why, it´s exactly the same as the ps3 which is a great console… (except you have to pay money to play online and shit while that´s free for pc and ps3)

      Thumb up 22 Thumb down 26
      • Ha
        November 6th, 2011 at 12:41 am

        At least we have security online, not to mention that our online service offers toms more features than PSN.

        Thumb up 34 Thumb down 37
        • Trollzor
          November 6th, 2011 at 1:04 am

          Damn you guys don’t stop with this console crap huh? I feel really bad for the PC guys as i feel like they have less people online to play with :\

          HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 58 Thumb down 5
        • Indi
          November 6th, 2011 at 1:57 am

          Ummm you do realise that your a dumbass? Didn’t you know that Xbox got hacked even worse before the release of halo3???You Xbox fags need to learn your history!
          And yes Xbox accounts got hacked…So its even for PS3 and Xbox…Not to mention your shit RoD crap in the past

          Thumb up 25 Thumb down 25
        • deadeye009
          November 6th, 2011 at 3:12 am

          Indi it’s not just the past xbox still has the highest failure rate of the 3 consoles (wii, ps3, and 360) being at 10%.

          Thumb up 13 Thumb down 7
      • Implied
        November 6th, 2011 at 1:00 am

        Lighting/Shadows etc. are slightly worse on the Xbox, due to its slightly older Hardware. Massive Xbox sales not surprising though, Xbox Gamers have always leaned more towards FPSs, partly due to highly rated Xbox-Exclusive FPSs, or early Xbox Access to some Games. Gears of War – Xbox Exclusive, Halo – Xbox Exclusive since almost 10 years now, CoD – One month early access to all DLCs (although, I’m doubting that a majority of those Sales is CoD Switchovers). And I think I’m forgetting something.

        HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 13 Thumb down 3
    • bf3 is awesome
      November 6th, 2011 at 12:44 am

      trolololololo. its funny, because it looks better on xbox and has less loading time than ps3 version. we also dont get our network brought down for a month by a single teenager, but whatever, have fun with your console.

      Thumb up 21 Thumb down 34
      • Implied
        November 6th, 2011 at 1:04 am

        “by a single teenager”

        iTroll too. Trololo.

        Thumb up 14 Thumb down 11
      • Trollzor
        November 6th, 2011 at 3:06 am

        Someone didn’t take there meds today LOL!!! The only difference between the PS3 and XBOX360 version is the “faster loading times” on the XBOX and that about it. No we did not get hacked by a “Teenager” we got hacked buy a major hacking group called Anonymous know your facts dumbass =D

        HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 30 Thumb down 1
        • i love bf3
          November 6th, 2011 at 8:59 pm

          what are you talking about? it wasn’t anonymous… they declined all involvement. the teenager(yes teenager, he was like 15 or 16) was trained by anonymous, but they had no involvement other than that. why don’t you know YOUR facts? troll: ps3 is horrible, worst thing ever invented. psn is a piece of shit, and the only thing ps3 has is exclusives. xbox is better in every way. xbox has better textures and less loading times for bf3(fact). even with that slight edge, it still makes a difference

          Thumb up 2 Thumb down 6
      • Indi
        November 6th, 2011 at 3:15 am

        Actually you just made your Xbox community look like complete gay fags who don’t know there history…I assure you that Xbox got hacked for 2 MONTHS in the past before halo 3 came out!!!! so jokes on you! (Trolololol)
        And no it wasn’t a single teen who did was a group of anonymous people…It was just one teen who was part of that group that decided to do it.. so he did it with his TEAM NOT ON HIS OWN!!!and again learn your facts…
        At least PS3 users dont have a 50% Chance of getting a YOD (RoD Version of PS3)
        Which you guys get ripped off…. and again trolololol
        And PS3 users have free internet so no need to pay monthly trolololol
        And it looks better on Xbox? WTF are you on? Drugs?
        The ground on Xbox looks like vomit texture…Your lighting looks gay and dim…Look it up on google PS3 vs Xbox BF3
        Just dont reply back you just made yourself look like a gay fag
        So TROLOLOLOLOLOLOL to your gay 12 year old fags of the Xbox community have a nice day

        Thumb up 12 Thumb down 20
        • Trollzor
          November 6th, 2011 at 3:33 am

          Woah take it ez man i think you showed your point lol

          HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 19 Thumb down 1
        • Peterson
          November 6th, 2011 at 5:46 am

          Xbox isnt still being hacked…

          Thumb up 11 Thumb down 8
        • I played the alpha
          November 6th, 2011 at 7:10 pm

          i was gonna sell my xbox and buy a ps3. I’ve been a xbox supporter before it was even released back in 2001 or somewhere around that time but xbox is really starting to piss me off, i’ve had 2 xbox’s died (so does my friend) and i find it difficult for me to buy a system then pay again to play online and THEN pay again to play that same game online with a different GT (this is on all platforms) but still… didnt bother to switch because I heard that the PSN lags alot during gameplay if it wasnt for that then I would’ve switched. Plus i think ps3 has better exclusives. I think i’ll be buying the next playstation when it comes out.

          Thumb up 1 Thumb down 6
        • PS3rd grader?
          November 6th, 2011 at 9:29 pm

          Yeah, I think you just proved that ps3 has the most immature people playing on it. I see more moronic comments from PS3 users like you than from 360 or PC users combined.

          Thumb up 1 Thumb down 5
      • creeper43
        November 14th, 2011 at 7:41 am

        1st the hack wasnt done by one teenager u retard and 2nd i find it funny that all u stupid retarded xbox a$$ clowns like to say xbox has better graphics. its been show and proven that ps3 has better graphics, the only reason xbox has better graphics on multiplatform game is becuase certain developers refuse to design their game to take control of ps3 power simply becuase its a bitch to do and takes up time so they design for xbox and then port it to ps3 which makes the ps3 version look (slightly) worse. i challenge you to name 1 and i mean 1 xbox exclusive game that has better graphics than uncharted 3 and gran turismo 5. Also 2 known facts are 1 that ps3 has blu ray . 2 it has games design specificaly to take control of 3d tech. its a 3d blu ray player and has a huge content base on 3d and has better apps. faster access to movies and has a full internet browser. also i havent seen any microsft 3dtv’s come out actually not even a microsoft HDtv. xbox is the past people only bought it becuase it was here first thats it.

        Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
  4. mrizzel
    November 6th, 2011 at 12:24 am

    Umm 500.000 on PC? Either this is a joke or many, many more didn’t buy the game because of Origin! Either way, without EA it would have outsold COD, but no, they had to do everything wrong. :(

    Thumb up 16 Thumb down 11
    • Implied
      November 6th, 2011 at 12:55 am

      I’m thinking the PC numbers are hugely underestimated, with most people getting the Game directly from Origin so as not to have to deal with Direct2Drive/GameStop/Whatever’s Store, and then in turn Origin.

      Either way, it would have never outsold MW3, that was just an illusion EA created for themselves and for Investors. CoD’s Fanbase exploded with Blops, now all those Blops fans are tired, and they want something new. MW3. Just because EA tried to make some wanna-be CoD Switchover Game and we ended up with a Semi-BC3, doesn’t mean people are just going to drop CoD and go for BF3. They paraded the Game around as if it was a God, its a great game, but people who consider CoD to be God aren’t about to drop the series because of fancy Trailers.

      Them rushing the game so it could come out before MW3 and “affect” its Sales didn’t help issues much. Look how we ended up – Day 1 Patch adding features which were supposed to be in, massive Server Issues across all Platforms, bunch of Bugs/Issues (some even from Alpha, like Flashlights being more like Spotlights), horrible Rush Ported Maps, and latest discovery, they even had to switch Lead Platform.

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 12 Thumb down 3
    • deadeye009
      November 6th, 2011 at 3:14 am

      You forgot that steam doesn’t release sales numbers…. oh wait :D

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 13 Thumb down 0
      • lulz
        November 6th, 2011 at 10:45 am

        steam? BF3 isn’t available on steam.. lol

        Thumb up 2 Thumb down 5
        • Anooo
          November 25th, 2011 at 7:56 pm

          That was the joke…Steam has over 35 million users, so EA being so stubborn has caused them to lose a lot of sales. Also, this article doesn’t include Origin/Direct2Drive/Gamersgate/etc. sales anyway, which make up most of the PC sales.

          Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  5. yams in a can
    November 6th, 2011 at 12:25 am

    Well well, that means any PC elitest better shut up. THIS IS WHY PEOPLE USE THE CONSOLE AS THE LEAD PLATFORM.

    Thumb up 21 Thumb down 35
    • LS
      November 6th, 2011 at 12:29 am

      not everyone can play on a PC
      so yeah, i like the scores

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 17 Thumb down 7
    • Binksss
      November 6th, 2011 at 1:08 am

      Why? We argue about pc is the elite of gaming. Of course they are more unable (assisted) people to build something simple as a pc, like you on console than people able to think by themselve.

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 11 Thumb down 3
    • Gundam288
      November 6th, 2011 at 3:56 am

      Just like GTA and every other M game on the market, how much you want to bet a LOT of the people playing BF3 on consoles are under 17?

      PC, I would say they bought it but might have stoped playing it due to battlelog being a hassle/facebook.

      Console = Put in disc and play

      PC = load up orign + log into battlelog website + “try” to find a server.

      the casual player is going to take a console over PC for just being able to load it right up and NOT have to go thru 20 steps to connect to a mutiplayer game…

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 16 Thumb down 6
      • Cruiseshipfan
        November 6th, 2011 at 7:00 am

        I brought it and I am older then 17 and have yet to find anyone who is younger yet. Well at least the people who have mics. Unlike COD where you almost only see people that are under the age of 17 and mostly around 12.

        Also I don’t like PC gaming because I forget which keys to use and I just prefer a controller.

        Also computers, even custom ones are very expensive here.

        Thumb up 5 Thumb down 5
        • Cruiseshipfan
          November 6th, 2011 at 7:04 am

          PS3 at least. Xbox 360 will have a much younger audience, and more immature community).

          Thumb up 7 Thumb down 6
        • PS3rd grader?
          November 6th, 2011 at 9:39 pm

          hahaha cruise ship, your comment is proof that ps3 users are the most immature.

          Thumb up 1 Thumb down 3
    • v3rtz
      November 6th, 2011 at 4:23 am

      Just because a platform sells more doesn’t make it better.

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 24 Thumb down 4
      • LordsXO
        November 7th, 2011 at 3:03 am

        It does make it more popular though.

        Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
    • Toma
      November 6th, 2011 at 6:55 am

      Keep playing on your 6-year old hardware console

      Thumb up 4 Thumb down 6
      • Bobbie001
        November 6th, 2011 at 8:46 pm

        I happen to have a 6 year old hardware pc wich cant even play a single game decently anymore

        Thumb up 5 Thumb down 1
  6. pcgamingisgay
    November 6th, 2011 at 12:28 am

    Hahahahahaha the pc fanboys are fuming hahahahahahaha stick that in your smug pipes and smoke it lol

    Thumb up 16 Thumb down 41
    • Implied
      November 6th, 2011 at 1:01 am

      Grow up, seriously.

      Exactly why I don’t play Consoles. Well, immature community and the crappy Graphics.

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 37 Thumb down 18
      • deadeye009
        November 6th, 2011 at 3:17 am

        Really? Don’t go talking about people being immature when its on consoles and PC.

        Thumb up 7 Thumb down 10
      • Trollzor
        November 6th, 2011 at 3:54 am

        He really is making the console community look bad -_-

        HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 21 Thumb down 4
        • Implied
          November 6th, 2011 at 5:00 am

          Why, they get any better?

          Thumb up 10 Thumb down 4
      • John
        November 6th, 2011 at 1:20 pm

        Last time i checked console didn’t have crappy graphics……….same with the bad community, its not bad at all.

        Thumb up 6 Thumb down 3
    • nERVEcenter
      November 6th, 2011 at 1:02 am

      At least we have pipes, you low-class, filthy, blunt-smoking peasant.

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 34 Thumb down 8
      • PS3 Skynet
        November 6th, 2011 at 1:40 am

        hey now, don’t drag blunts into this. there are plenty of high class blunts out there ya know?!

        HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 14 Thumb down 3
      • Trollzor
        November 6th, 2011 at 3:15 am


        Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1
      • Gundam288
        November 6th, 2011 at 4:02 am

        so you have a better chance of being busted for “Drug paraphernalia”?

        that’s what you get for not passing…..

        Thumb up 3 Thumb down 4
    • Binksss
      November 6th, 2011 at 1:05 am

      Why should we? We are not majority of kids cuming for a “victory sale”…
      Damn, you’re pathetic and so sad.

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 14 Thumb down 2
    • Trollzor
      November 6th, 2011 at 3:13 am

      You sir, do not know that PC gaming is the father of Console gaming your such a dumbass lmao!!!!!!!

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 17 Thumb down 2
      November 6th, 2011 at 3:19 am

      You sir need to learn how to read. The digital downloads haven’t been accounted for, therefore the numbers are completely inaccurate. I know most people purchased the game through Origin. GG kid. Have fun on your dumbed down version of the game while I play on 1080p Ultra settings. HAHA you fukkin tool.

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 16 Thumb down 6
    • Tummynator
      November 6th, 2011 at 6:04 am

      OMG!! IM SO FUMING BECUZ PC DIDNT OUTSELL BOTH CONSOLES!!!! … but really kid … who gives a fuck .. grow the fuck up .. grow a pair of balls .. bf3 is out, go play it and stop being a little bitch :D

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 13 Thumb down 2
    • PS3rd grader?
      November 6th, 2011 at 9:41 pm

      Guarantee this guy is a PS3 fanboy. They spend all day online bashing other platforms instead of playing their precious ps3.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 6
      • Trollzor
        November 7th, 2011 at 4:28 am

        How do you know? I my self play on PS3 and i keep my trap shut.

        Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
  7. iBass
    November 6th, 2011 at 12:30 am

    inb4 console bashers.
    Proves that consoles (especially xbox 360) were, are and will be the leading platform for games, as games are made by capitalistic companies, and not by charities.
    Get over it PC elitists.

    Thumb up 10 Thumb down 15
    • Patrick
      November 6th, 2011 at 12:50 am

      Don’t really care for the console argument wars, but just bare in mind that Origin would account for a huge number of PC sales.

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 23 Thumb down 1
    • Implied
      November 6th, 2011 at 1:03 am

      Yeah, and DICE is totally going in that direction too, proven by how BC2 was developed side-by-side for PC/Consoles, and how the original Lead Platform for BF3 was PC, until they switched due to EA’s time constraints.

      Also proven by how the majority of PC Sales are probably lacking from those numbers, since there’s no Origin Numbers.

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
    • Binksss
      November 6th, 2011 at 1:10 am

      We are not elitist, you are a fan boy. Quantity is not quality, “au contraire”.

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 21 Thumb down 4
    • Anooo
      November 25th, 2011 at 7:58 pm

      Considering this doesn’t include digital purchases through Origin/Direct2Drive/Gamersgate/etc. which always make up the majority of PC sales (look at Steam for example), this is completely inaccurate.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  8. hgirejg
    November 6th, 2011 at 12:40 am

    xbox is the wort fot bf3??? Do people read developer news!!

    Thumb up 2 Thumb down 6
    • hgirejg
      November 6th, 2011 at 12:41 am

      worst. sorry

      Thumb up 1 Thumb down 9
  9. Kernkraft
    November 6th, 2011 at 12:40 am

    Please BF3Blog, just cut it out with the console news. Nothing good ever comes out of this things.

    HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 18 Thumb down 5
    • ImStalkinYou
      November 6th, 2011 at 9:11 am

      yes, one good thing comes out of the console wars; lots of people (including me) getting a good laugh because of the silly arguments we are making about which is the best :D

      Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  10. BODY YA 6O2
    November 6th, 2011 at 12:41 am

    Does it better which platfrom it sold best at?BF3 FTW!!!

    HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 19 Thumb down 0
    • Jack of All Trades
      November 6th, 2011 at 6:17 am

      I think you mean matter instead of better but I agree
      All these people argueing about stupid sales and starting retarded arguements for no reason are just either butt hurt becase thier system, which they see a need to defend at the cost of thier dignaty, didn’t sell much or condesending becase they think sales = quality I mean really If you are an xbox gamer soes it really matter if the pc guys only bought 500,000 copies or 10? No! it doesnt affect you in the slightest! So nearly all arguments on this particular page are now invalid. I appreciate you guys giving me a chance to test out my anger management skills, peace, and keep on arguing While My buddies and I (grammer win) attain the highest rank possible on this game k? k. cya

      Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
      • BODY YA 6O2
        November 6th, 2011 at 8:29 pm

        Thanks for pointing that out.

        Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  11. Ha
    November 6th, 2011 at 12:43 am

    Well obviously there has been some speculation on who BF3 was made for. PC elitists have almost no ammunition anymore, as they are no longer the main form of BF3 on either sales or programming.

    Thumb up 5 Thumb down 9
  12. Koenverd
    November 6th, 2011 at 12:47 am

    I advise everybody to wait for the Origin sale numbers.
    Why? Because BF:BC2 had more players on the PC than on the XBOX or the PS3, and I expect this to be same with BF3.

    HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 12 Thumb down 1
    • Implied
      November 6th, 2011 at 1:07 am

      This. Seriously people trolling PCs should read the whole Article.

      Then gain some Maturity Points for doing so.

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 13 Thumb down 1
      • LJ
        November 6th, 2011 at 2:08 am

        console fanboys cant stand reading article till end. that what you may call difference between some mature folks and kids. I haven’t mention even about understanding but I believe it is unreachable achievement :D

        Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
    • DIRK
      November 7th, 2011 at 4:58 pm

      That’s not true, xbox 360 led the way in bc2 also. I don’t understand if Pc gamers are trying to feel like they’re in the (in group) or if they just want to feel like they’re important.

      Oh and yes PC is a more expensive platform, with better graphics, Not all of us live in our grandma’s basement rent free and can afford one. If you look at the targeted demographics for all three xbox 360′s target is the oldest 19-35.

      But I really don’t care who plays the most, I do however get tired of trying to read news through the my graphics card is better than yours and it feels oh so much better on a mouse and keyboard.

      Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
  13. Purple Thunder7
    November 6th, 2011 at 12:55 am

    To all the pc players that are talking shit about xbox, I hope you realize that without consoles battlefield 3 wouldnt have enough money to be developed and DICE would be shut down. And to the others of the 500,000 that aren’t assholes, I’m sorry u have to play with these dicks.

    Thumb up 6 Thumb down 15
    • Implied
      November 6th, 2011 at 1:10 am

      Without Consoles more people would be buying the PC Version, meaning the PC Sales would overall be higher, they wouldn’t be broke however. Frostbite 2 might not look the same as it does, but they’d be far from broke, just as they were far from broke before they started developing for Consoles.

      If you really think that, going by your “theory,” DICE would have gone broke soon after developing BF 2142, since they’d have (probably) not done BC1/2, and gone straight ahead to BF3, which we would have probably gotten 1-ish year ago, and we’d be playing the Expansion Packs for it right now, right? Just think before you type. Seriously.

      Thumb up 14 Thumb down 7
      • Binksss
        November 6th, 2011 at 1:13 am


        HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 11 Thumb down 3
      • Gundam288
        November 6th, 2011 at 4:07 am

        that makes me wonder if they would have still used the Refactor 2 engine for BF3.

        Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
        • Implied
          November 6th, 2011 at 5:04 am

          Na, we’d probably either have Refractor 3, or Frostbite 1. Either way would probably look like something between the current Frostbite 1 (BC1) and Frostbite 1.5 (BC2).

          Probably depends on whether EA would have still bought out DICE. Guess in the end EA is a necessary nuisance for better Quality Battlefield Games in the end… :(

          Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
        • Implied
          November 6th, 2011 at 5:07 am

          Alternatively EA could have still bought out DICE, but they’d have licensed Unreal Engine 3 or CryEngine 3 and modified that to suit their needs instead (Destruction etc). But yeah, high BC Series Sales are what convinced EA to give DICE such a big Budget for Frostbite 2, pretty sure.

          Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1
      • Purple Thunder7
        November 6th, 2011 at 5:36 am

        Okay so you think it costs the same to develop battlefield 3 as the 6-year old battlefield 2? Also, without console profits battlefield 3 would have a shit marketing campaign and even LESS people would buy it. And I bet all my money EA would cut off DICE if they tried making a pc only game. I hate to say it but there is little reason for most developers to make games for pc at all. Gears of War 3, for example, would lose money if it came out for pc because Microsoft pays them extra to keep it off their own operating system.

        Thumb up 0 Thumb down 4
        • Implied
          November 6th, 2011 at 7:35 am

          You seem to be misunderstanding something. Microsoft isn’t paying Epic Games to keep the Game off PCs. Its paying them to keep it off PS3. They tried GoW on Windows, I tried it too. It sucked. That’s why they never made GoW 2/GoW 3 for PC. They tried it, it sucked, they moved on. They didn’t tank the PC Market with another crappy Port, which I’m actually grateful for.

          Battlefield 3 never needed a Marketing Campaign. What it needed, and still needs, is for EA to shut up and get back to Publishing, rather than Dick-Tating how to Develop a Game which nobody asked for, a BC3 Wanna-Be.

          Alternate Universe Theory:
          DICE doesn’t sell out to EA. DICE goes from BF2142 to BF3. They design the Refractor 3 Engine, or the Frostbite 1 Engine, whatever you want. Graphics Quality is somewhere between Frostbite 1 (BC1) and Frostbite 1.5 (BC2). Smaller budget since they didn’t get any of the income from BC1/2 and the Console Port of BF2 + 1943. Biggest loss is obviously from BC2, which sold over 10 Million Copies.

          Gameplay Quality however, is fantastic. Amazing. Unbelievable. Rivals and beats Battlefield 2′s. It pounds it down into mush. It has no competition. Its not a CoD Switchover Game waiting to be pumped full of DLCs. Its not some Semi-BC3 Game, its Battlefield 3. A true successor to Battlefield 2. And it came out last year. Right now, we’d be rolling around in the 1st, possibly 2nd Expansion Pack while possibly even waiting on the 3rd. We’d be laughing at CoD Fanboys and their overpriced DLCs. We’d be laughing at MW3. We wouldn’t have a Battlefield Failbook which nobody ever asked for, we wouldn’t have annoying Origin “Spyware” running in the background. No. We’d have grabbed the game from Steam, and we’d be laughing, mocking EA’s crappy Origin which would be bound to fail. While sure, Origin would still feature Battlefield 3, since EA would still be Publishing BF3, they’d have no Legal Basis to keep BF3 off of Steam, that decision would be entirely up to DICE.

          Did I mention how the Launch wouldn’t be plagued by a rushed Launch because the Publisher who bought out the Studio wanted to get it out before the next CoD Game? And how the Beta doesn’t have Operation Metro on Rush Mode to entice all the CoD Gamers to switch over? Actually, how it probably has no Rush Mode at all, rather, maybe something Classic instead – Capture the Flag. Or, did I mention how the Game would survive for ages past the Expansion Packs, since it would have Mod Tools, and an active, huge Modding Community, rather than 6 months of “Aggressive DLCs”?

          And next year/year after, we’d get Battlefield 4. Rocking Frostbite 2-2.5 Level Graphics. Because the Game attracts all sorts of people. Everyone wants it. And there wouldn’t be as many Console Fanboys and Publishers screaming at the top of their Lungs to anyone who’d listen about how “PC Gaming is Dead” bla bla bla.

          But who knows. Maybe even in this Alternate Universe it does have a Console Port. Maybe BC2 does happen, and BF3 works across all 3 Platforms, with Frostbite 2 level Graphics, and PC always being Lead in Development. Maybe its not rushed through Development because the Publisher who did/didn’t buy out the Studio is pushing it through, damn whether or not its done, in some desperate pathetic and stupid attempt to re-route MW3 Sales.

          Or maybe in another Alternate Universe EA buys out DICE, and actually lets them make their own Games, without interference, as long as they work fine on PC/PS3/Xbox 360. No interference, no nothing.

          I personally don’t give a flying fuck whether or not its on Consoles or not, as long as they don’t throw in Cross-Platform Gameplay. Long as the Console Communities stay away from me, I don’t care if DICE makes a BF for Consoles. What I do care is that EA has succeeded in Tanking BF3. 8.1 Million Beta Users, 5 Million Sales in the 1st Week. What, 3 Million Medal of Honor Pre-Orders didn’t like the Beta? No. EA’s Beta managed to actually make people Cancel their Pre-Orders.

          Thumb up 6 Thumb down 1
    • Trollzor
      November 6th, 2011 at 10:00 pm

      Do you not know BF started on PC? sheesh

      Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
      • Tummynator
        November 6th, 2011 at 11:11 pm

        no these kids were born before 1942 (If ya know what i mean :D :D :D )

        Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
        • Tummynator
          November 6th, 2011 at 11:11 pm


          Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
      • Purple Thunder7
        November 6th, 2011 at 11:43 pm

        Yea I have every bf game except this new one. I don’t think most of you understood my point. I love pc I’m just letting the pc elitists know they should be grateful for the consoles in this situation. Sure pc gets shitting ports sometimes but DICE used console profits to make this game wat it is and everybody on this site should get along. I also have one more question…why do all of you hate Cod players? If u dont play cod u dont have to deal with them but u go out of ur way to antagonize them. Why is that?

        Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1
  14. Will
    November 6th, 2011 at 12:59 am

    I started my Battlefield experience on PC with BF1942, BF2, BF2142. Moved to console (360) for all the others when money didn’t allow pc gaming to continue, and my experience has has ALWAYS been this: Battlefield is fun. Regardless of platform, I’ve always enjoyed it. Why do we continue to worry about who is having the most fun between platforms? Its what you make of it.

    HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0
    • mm
      November 6th, 2011 at 4:24 pm

      Yeah, REAL talk. Played em too on PC, then had to buy a Xbox, cause i thought every friend of mine have it and console gaming is better. Nah.. after 1 ½ year now, i really prefer PC, even I still play on Xbox. Ok, the graphics are fine, but when you look at PC gameplay.. man you dream about great gaming rig, and you can even play with controllers/joysticks on PC! But the gameplay is the most important thing about BF so I have to be satisfied for it on Xbox, and yeah it’s awesome on consoles 2 ! But ye, getting a gaming rig in a half a year! now lets end this xbox vs ps3 vs pc war, and lets concentrate on BF3!

      Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1
  15. Ol Ron Reagan
    November 6th, 2011 at 1:13 am

    Come on. Seriously? Everybody always argues over sales. Blah blah blah. I’m a 360 gamer, but seriously? CoD sales more. 360 sells more. So? McDonalds sells the most food, but it’s not fine dining.

    The only thing anyone should be bashing is an overpriced DVD player. I believe it’s called a Playstation 3….

    HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 16 Thumb down 7
    • Implied
      November 6th, 2011 at 1:17 am

      But… But… It plays overpriced Hollywood Blu-Rays! :(

      Thumb up 5 Thumb down 3
    • EverydayiBeTrollin
      November 6th, 2011 at 1:33 am

      Jesus christ.. get over yourself. both systems do the same shit. I got a ps3 in 2006 fighting the fucking crowds to find out it is the SAME SYSTEM. xbox has an anual fee for online and ps3 has blueray. what else is different? nothing.

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
    • PS3 Skynet
      November 6th, 2011 at 1:44 am

      watch out man, the air force has the ps3 skynet in waiting. it’s true google it!

      Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
    • Indi
      November 6th, 2011 at 2:01 am

      WOWWWWW Great fucking speech until the last sentence you dickhead…If though you weren’t gonna argue about consoles until i read that last sentence….and thank god i don’t have an xbox
      Because 12 year old kids will be screaming On BF3 and theres no muting system since everyone gets a free mic with there xboxs

      Thumb up 4 Thumb down 5
      • Brad
        November 6th, 2011 at 6:21 am

        there is a mute button you know, or you can simply be in party chat with friends and not hear anyone eles but them.

        Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
      • Ha
        November 6th, 2011 at 2:55 pm

        Since when did this happen? Microsoft gives nothing for free!

        Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
      • mm
        November 6th, 2011 at 6:45 pm

        Actually i haven’t met that problem yet. And there is a VOIP setup below the squad setup > Squad only > Team only > Party only > Mute

        Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • Tummynator
      November 6th, 2011 at 6:08 am

      haha … first console v console post

      Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
  16. IItRueII
    November 6th, 2011 at 1:15 am

    Ok its worldwide apparently, but still they are known to be not accurate at all…

    Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  17. Rossini
    November 6th, 2011 at 1:17 am

    Consol wars? Come on guys I’d play PC if I had more money to upgrade, I’d play ps3 if I would have got that instead of my Xbox for Christmas and I don’t care what you play on, I do care if u are a cod fanboy… BF3 FTW :)

    Thumb up 8 Thumb down 2
  18. Doom721
    November 6th, 2011 at 1:17 am

    People who own consoles generally buy games retail because you can’t digitally buy most console games. Regardless of age hard retail sales don’t make much sense without the bigger picture of digital sales.

    So obviously all the sales of Xbox/PS are retail sales and none digital, whereas PC is a mix of both, maybe more digital. I never buy an actual hard copy of a PC game now-a-days with Steam, D2D, and sadly Origin. Too lazy to do that.

    Sales are sales, should get Dice working on the future DLC packs that I’m sure PC and Console players alike will be buying.

    Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
    • Gundam288
      November 6th, 2011 at 4:14 am

      ^— this.

      the only time I get a hard copy of a game is if I get a collectors ed. with some goodies in it, and even that is rare.

      Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
    • Ha
      November 6th, 2011 at 2:57 pm

      XBL Marketplace and PSN both support digital copies of the games being brought from the console. So saying there are no digital sales is invalid.

      Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1
  19. THE-MERC
    November 6th, 2011 at 1:24 am

    Im not suprised that bf3 sold 5 million copies in its 1st week.
    I just love BF its one of those great rare games! littarly they should have FPS & bf seprate game genres because bf3 is 100,000,000% better than any FPS game!! I speak the truth & the truth olny. Sorry for any missspelled words.

    Thumb up 4 Thumb down 2
  20. EverydayiBeTrollin
    November 6th, 2011 at 1:26 am

    The game may look better on the PC and the online community may not be snot nosed kids (due to how costly it is to keep upgrading your PC to look so good), but what can you say? More people own Xbox. I have a Ps3 and 360 and bought it for the 360 due to the bigger online community. I highly recommend you stop with the Platform wars bullcrap because the ps3 and xbox are the same shit. To be honest the ps3 might have the edge just because the online is free, but like i said, more people play xbox. maybe because it was cheaper back in the day than the ps3.. who knows. Just stop bitching about what system it’s better for and play the game.

    Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
    • Implied
      November 6th, 2011 at 2:31 am

      I always thought highly rated Xbox-Exclusive FPS Series brought more FPS Gamers to the Xbox. That, and the CoD 1-Month Exclusive, although I doubt we’ve had that many CoD Switchovers. I mean Games like the Gears of War Series, the Halo Series, and I think I’m forgetting one.

      Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
      • EverydayiBeTrollin
        November 6th, 2011 at 3:12 am

        Bioshock and the gears series is what really made me come to the xbox. you’re also forgetting left4dead. but that isn’t pvp. As for people switching for CoD exclusives.. i kinda doubt that. CoD will get burnt out just as the halo series did. (for me anyways) The “fanboys” will keep coming back and the people that look for newer and better fps games will go for games like battlefield and the ps3 exclusive MAG. (which i thought would be a bigger better Battlefield, and it really wasn’t.)

        Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
        • Gundam288
          November 6th, 2011 at 4:20 am

          never played the xbox version but, Left4Dead was on the PC as well, and I really think L4D2 should have been an exp. pack or something, not a new game since not much was changed.

          I rem. reading about mag back before it came out and the idea was neat. but I’ve herd that not everyone is on the same map at on time. that was the whole idea why I thought it was neat.

          so many games over the past few years have not lived up to the hype.

          Spore, Mag, RIFT(they said it was going to be a WoW killer.. lol) the list just goes on and on and on…

          Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
        • Reaver
          November 6th, 2011 at 4:49 am

          Bioshock was also on PC.. So really you’re saying you switched because of Gears..

          Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
        • Implied
          November 6th, 2011 at 5:14 am

          Yeah, Bioshock had the usually Trinity (XBox/PS3/PC) while L4D had PC/OS X/Xbox 360. Those two probably didn’t attract as many people as Xbox-Exclusives, but they probably did attract some new Gamers.

          RIFT was supposed to be a WoW Clone from the beginning. While it didn’t attract the (what is it now?) 10 Million-ish(?) WoW Gamers, it did attract a fair bunch. Its like, WoW, but improved.

          MAG was…. Different. Not a favorite, but non the less, not “Terri-Bad” either.

          Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
    • DarknessHERO
      November 6th, 2011 at 11:31 am

      I totally agree, I wanted it for PC but didnt want to purchase a new one for 500-800 dollar so i choose xbox because have tons of friends on their +19(age) and their community is great. In the future i might get it for PC.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
  21. NoFreakinIdea
    November 6th, 2011 at 1:30 am

    That’s just fucked up. The huge ass PC title fails. I cant believe that the console which is advertised in every COD trailer (Pre order now for XBox 360 – my ass, biatch!) has 2.2 million sales while the “leading platform” (which just turned out to be the least important platform, again) has 500k sold copies? WTF is going on… Seriously that’s just disappointing… You know what, f*** the world, I’m gonna upgrade my PC anyway.

    Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
    • RebornShadow
      November 6th, 2011 at 7:15 am

      You do know that most PC players buy their games via digital distribution?

      Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
  22. THE-MERC
    November 6th, 2011 at 1:34 am

    @”bf3 is awesome” you can’t blame ps3 players for the network brought down its sony’s problem & why cant u give it a rest this was 5 months ago grow up & give it rest! Im not picking a fight so no flaming. you wanna argue thats your problem not mine! bf3 FTW!! iLL c evryone on the battlefield $)

    Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
  23. chrissavart
    November 6th, 2011 at 2:04 am

    in europe we don,t spend our time playing shooter .why you guys can,t realise that AMERICA is where shooter sells most. why you guys don,t post “FIFA 12 on PS3 sold twice as muchthan xbox360″??

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 11
    • MrMahn
      November 6th, 2011 at 2:30 am

      Because this is BATTLEFIELD 3 Blog, perhaps?


      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 13 Thumb down 0
    • Reaver
      November 6th, 2011 at 4:51 am

      Keep on topic lol

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  24. xxx_LeetConsoleGaymer_xxx
    November 6th, 2011 at 2:28 am

    This proves once and for all that PC gaming is dead, the final nail the coffin, enjoy your belated ports and 5000$ slightly better than console graphics you nerds

    Thumb up 4 Thumb down 20
    • Implied
      November 6th, 2011 at 2:58 am

      Totally proven by the lack of Origin Sales Numbers, and the Lead PC Platform until EA’s time constraint issues.

      Yeah, troll on.

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 10 Thumb down 1
      • Gundam288
        November 6th, 2011 at 4:26 am

        Even tho he is a troll, most “main stream” devs have pretty much turned away from the PC and went to consoles. look at crysis and all the other games. Can’t really recall the last time we got a true PC game from a major dev.

        It’s mainly indie now. It’s not a BAD thing, but I still don’t get why they are not trying to push the industry forward, instead of staying in place. (other than the money being in consoles)

        Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1
        • Implied
          November 6th, 2011 at 5:31 am

          Arguably BC2, since it was Developed side-by-side for PCs and Consoles. Otherwise, yeah, mostly just Small-Time Titles. Crytek’s move to Consoles Lead for Crysis 2 was just pathetic. Its like “Thanks for the Sales Numbers PC Gamers, now piss off.”

          Far as not trying to push the Industry forward, that’s simple. Consoles not been upgraded yet, so they focus on “improving” Gameplay instead. Then when the new Consoles come out, they jump the gun with a big new fancy Engine (Unreal Engine 4/CryEngine 4/) and Develop with that until the next Console Generation. Well, most Studios do that anyway. Right now, Engines are just about Maxed on these Consoles anyway so even if they wanted to dish the next ones out before, they’d be pointless.

          Since Consoles have less Piracy Issues (Plus Overall easier to Develop for. When’s the last time you heard of High-Res Texture Packs on a Console Game, excluding BF3? For example.), its an Easy-Money Market. Throw out a DLC for 5-10 Bucks once in a while on PSN/Xbox Live, people snap it up like Hungry Dogs to Meat, even though they’ll whine and complain about it first. Devs don’t even need to worry about stuff like DX11 Tessellation when it comes to the PC Version, since everyone just goes “Well, its Lead Console…..” Only reason Crysis 2 got DX11 is because people raged. Hard. Thankfully they at least had the decency to do it right. Damn, Tessellation is going to hit Console Devs hard when the Xbox 720/PS4 hit the Markets. Very hard.

          DICE gets it. Other Studios, not so much. Or they just don’t care. Develop for PC, Port to Console, you have a much wider selection of options. You can do things differently, better even. Of course, it costs more. Its also more work. When its PC Lead these days, people expect more. If you disappoint, they’ll hang you with a Noose.

          Activision/Infinity Ward still make a PC Version of CoD, but beyond making sure it actually Ships, the Support is ridiculously bad. They just don’t care. Mod Tools? Sure, no problem. After all, they’re right there, made by id Software ages ago for the Quake 3 Modding Community. Another excuse not to Support the game, let the Modding Community make the Fixes. I’m surprised MW3 will have Mod Tools, since they’re not using a modified id Tech 3 Engine anymore. But then again, why am I? Excuse not to Patch PC-Exclusive Issues after all. Unranked Dedicated Servers. Another Slap in the PC Face. On and on.

          Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
      • the unfanboy
        November 8th, 2011 at 5:59 pm

        You have to understand that just because something sells more or less doesnt make it better or worse. And even if origin sales werent accounted for yet, they still probably wont top console sales. And even if they were it doesnt matter.

        Console is the lead platform not because BF3 miiight sell more on it, but because every Call of Duty quadruples the sales on console that bf3 does on PC. So even if PC sells maybe the same amount as bf3 tiltles as consoles does. COD is still making 4x as much money. THAT is why console is lead, because there are just more people playing on consoles than on PC only. So like many other products that sell the most (iphones, toyotas, etc) they must cater to the masses if they want the most profits.

        No one can argue PC isnt more pwoerful than console. But there are a lot more toyota camry’s on the road than there are feraris.

        Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • PS3 Skynet
      November 6th, 2011 at 4:00 am

      5000$ 5760×1080 ULTRA graphics vs ‘slightly better than console graphics’ @ 1920×1080 LOW

      you have no idea, the future has already passed most console gamers’ imaginations…

      Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
      • RebornShadow
        November 6th, 2011 at 7:23 am

        Well, consoles don’t even support anything higher than 720p.

        And most people can’t accept the fact that a decent gaming rig costs about 400-500 Euro.

        Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
    • Reaver
      November 6th, 2011 at 4:53 am

      I’m pretty sure that 6 year old hardware is not just ‘slightly worse’ than present day hardware…

      I have 2 words left for you..
      Keyboard + Mouse

      Thumb up 9 Thumb down 2
      • Ha
        November 6th, 2011 at 3:01 pm

        The basic flaw in the Neumann architecture also makes PCs only improve marginally over the years. Of course the Processor and Graphics cards improve, but the bridge speed does not improve to keep up with them. It’s why a 6 year old console can adequately compete with a newer PC, because the bridge speeds are still quite close.

        Thumb up 0 Thumb down 5
        • Implied
          November 6th, 2011 at 4:24 pm

          Really? How interesting. Because I was just reading an article yesterday about how the upcoming AMD Radeon HD 7970 Single-GPU Card’s Power boost will make it comparable to the previous (current) Generation’s AMD Radeon HD 6990 Dual-GPU Card’s Power.

          Did I mention how in the last SIX Years, CPUs have gone from 1.x GHz with crappy Overclocking to Unlocked Multipliers with a (just 3 days ago set) World Record of 8.5 GHz with AMD’s latest APU? Intel’s Sandy Bridge alone can maintain 4GHz on Air Cooling, and its about to get better this upcoming year too.

          I’m curious as to how all that works in with your “Minimal Upgrades” Theory. Here’s a better example: Frostbite 2 can barely run on Consoles. CryEngine 3 still can. Unreal Engine 3.5 at full power – possibly. Bring Frostbite 3 into the picture now. How well do you think that’ll run on Consoles? 240p with 15 FPS? Nice Gameplay there. CryEngine 4? 30 FPS 480/720p? How about Unreal Engine 4? 30 FPS 480/720p?

          What do you think the Industry is waiting around for? New Consoles. PCs could easily run those in a year or two, Max Settings with SLi/CrossFire. Consoles on the other hand, would crash and burn.

          The reason Consoles can “play” reduced versions of Graphics Intensive Games these days is because Developers find ways to reduce the Pixel Count, not because Hardware Progression is too slow, which it most certainly is not, or because its Hardware is “special”. It used to be special. Now its just badly outdated to the point that it holds the entire industry back. Sony’s Cell Tech. isn’t going to last 10 years, that’s just ignorance to still be throwing that around 6 years later in the face of PCs 5-10 times stronger than the PS3. Thankfully they’re working on a PS4.

          Thumb up 3 Thumb down 3
        • I still havent played bf3
          November 7th, 2011 at 9:36 am

          The thing is Implied is when those Engines end up existing… The new generation of consoles will emerge and will be able to handle it.. Engines are not just poofed out spontaneously. You know this If your a PC owner. The PC has its pros and cons.. same with consoles. And you know what? out.. play it.. base jump.. go terrorist if you like.. and let your mind ease off this bashing.. No need

          Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
        • Implied
          November 7th, 2011 at 10:14 am

          Well, CryEngine 3 just came out with Crysis 2 earlier this year, meaning 2-3 years for CryEngine 4/Crysis 3 Development. Unreal Engine 4 is scheduled for 2014-ish (Unreal Tournament 4?), and Frostbite 2 just came out with Battlefield 3, so that gives them 2-3 years for Frostbite 3 to launch with Battlefield 4, they’ll probably take around 3 years. far as the other Engines, there’s no Source 2 due any time soon, id Software will probably start working on id Tech 6 after Doom 4 so that’s probably 3-4 years away, possibly 5 if they want to launch a Game with it as they did with id Tech 5 and RAGE.

          Xbox 720 is rumored for an E3 2013 Announcement with a late 2013/early 2014 Launch, and Sony wants to get the PS4 out ahead of the new Xbox so that’s probably coming around idk, mid 2013 maybe.

          Of course, if Windows (8) Metro throws us DX12 instead of the rumored DX11.1, that’ll mean a whole new Toolkit of goodies for Developers to incorporate into their Engines, and learn to play with as well. Lot of factors to consider, however overall I’d say new Generation of Engines could very well come out around the new Console Releases, with Major Title Releases (Crysis 3/BF4/UT4?) to follow just a few months later, possibly sooner/later depending on if Studios get Pre-Release Console access, how fast the Engine Coding gets done, etc. etc. etc.

          For sure, Studios are waiting on those though. Well, that and Windows Metro DirectX revelations.

          Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
    • mm
      November 6th, 2011 at 7:11 pm

      Nice name GAYmer :) – Guys I’m a console gamer, because I don’t afford a good gaming rig, even I prefer PC gaming! – But again don’t care what platform, until it’s Battlefield or some other great game (sry no cod)

      Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  25. Oh- Excuse me?! EXCUSE ME?!
    November 6th, 2011 at 2:29 am

    I’m rather disappointed, as a PC gamer, that the platform I play on sold the least copies of BF3, because it means less players I can play with.

    I used to play Quake 3, Unreal and then Quake Live during the years, but it’s clear people aren’t interested in arcade-style jump-around-and-shoot-with-all-sorts-of-awesome-weapons-of-mass-destruction games anymore, so I switched over to MW2. Lots of people play it on Steam, but sadly, I wasn’t aware back then, that Activision was neglecting the PC community so hard.

    After some 200+ hours, I put MW2 down and went over to BC2. It was awesome. About the same amount of people playing it as MW2, but with better support and a better experience. I thought BF3 would be groundbreaking as a successor to BF2 – which I have never played – and for me, I think it was well worth pre-ordering.

    Unfortunately, there are still a good few bugs which need to be sorted out on PC, but I only play TDM nowadays, so I’m not affected that much. I can only hope, that once the digital purchases are counted into the stats, we’ll see a sharp rise in just how many people actually bought BF3 for the PC, because if they didn’t…they don’t know what they’re missing out on!

    Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1
    • Ha
      November 6th, 2011 at 3:03 pm

      Maybe stop playing TDM and play a real game mode? That might improve the amount of people playing.

      Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1
    • Awelol
      November 6th, 2011 at 11:11 pm

      A few things you need to remember about PC sales, and how many you get to play with, since this is a pretty demanding game, and we haven’t really had a reason to upgrade our computers for the last what? 4-5 years due to consoles holding it back, then BF3 was released, and now we do have a reason to upgrade our computers for the first time in ages, people will do that then buy the game, on Digital Download of course, so nobody will see the numbers, then Dice get their mod tools done, then some awesome mods comes out, then more people buy the game, then we got the fact that a game on PC sell for ages compared to consoles, as PC gamers buy games at all times, and not just the first month it’s out. So, for us on PC, we’ll see more and more gamers to play with, and hopefully, when MW3 comes out, a lot go away, since I’m noticing a lot of MW mentality in the game atm. omg, your camping as one example.

      Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>