BF3blog.com -- the leading Battlefield 3 fan site, with news, updates, videos, screenshots, rumors, and more.
  
On August 20th, 2011 in News

BF3 Team Deathmatch
There have been plenty of reveals at GamesCom over the past few days, one of which involves the new game mode in Battlefield 3: Team Deathmatch. DICE has confirmed that Team Deathmatch in Battlefield 3 will support 24 players on all platforms, and will be without vehicles. Team Deathmatch will be focused entirely on tight infantry portions of regular maps.

While 24 players doesn’t sound like much compared to 64 players in conquest mode, remember that the map is tighter, the gameplay is more focused and intense. Bad Company 2′s squad deathmatch was limited to 16 players and never managed to feel inadequate. Which leads us to squad deathmatch in Battlefield 3: it hasn’t been confirmed, but it’s easy to imagine 12 player teams be split up into 3 squads in Team Deathmatch.



82 COMMENTS & TRACKBACKS

  1. steve
    August 20th, 2011 at 7:17 pm

    whoa thats heavy

    Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
  2. Starch
    August 20th, 2011 at 7:18 pm

    WHYY DICE, WHYYY?

    NO VEHICLES?

    Thumb up 4 Thumb down 28
    • J Money
      August 20th, 2011 at 8:26 pm

      because the maps will be tighter, if you want vehicles play conquest or rush, vehicles are awesome but a game mode without them will also be great, it depends what you want, if you want vehicles DON’T play deathmatch, its that easy.

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 26 Thumb down 0
    • kelleroid
      August 20th, 2011 at 8:57 pm

      You wanna know why there’s no vehicles in TDM?

      Just look at CoD with the killstreaks in TDM.

      Once a (few) good conscious player(s) get into an armored vehicle the game is over for everyone else on the other team.

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 23 Thumb down 3
      • PaulC2K
        August 20th, 2011 at 9:23 pm

        Im actually a little surprised theres negativity towards no vehicles, personally ive always hated their inclusion in *some* of the game modes/maps.
        Squad deathmatch for example, they give you a smallish map to have a decent scrap in, and dump an LAV in there and it makes it feel rather lob-sided. Yeah, theres the challenge of stopping others getting to it, but I cant help but feel that it would simply be *balanced* if it was all on foot.

        For people who actually like the on-foot combat, and still use teamwork and tactics, your pretty much out of luck in BC2. Rush – Vehicles, Conquest – Vehicles, Sq. DM – Vehicle… and yey for 4v4 squad rush, all 3min of it.

        Its nice to have a populated game mode where we can run around without someone plonking a tank on a hillside and shooting at random dots scrambling about, heli’s flying about when there isnt an effective anti-air weapon in there…
        Im not fussed about TDM, but i’ll play it from time to time to get away from the tanks & co, it wont be as good as Cq but it’ll be nice to have a mode free from heavy & air vehicles.

        By all means, i want plenty of vehicular mayhem in the bigger maps, i’d LOVE just the option of joining no-vehicle servers, but that doesnt seem to be possible. This is, for me, not the next best thing, but its better than always having them in there.
        **im not 100% sure if there is a no-vehicles setting for PC hosts, but i dont recall ever joining one, and you cant quick search for them**

        HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 16 Thumb down 1
  3. Q3id
    August 20th, 2011 at 7:21 pm

    It would be unreasonable to expect a high player count in a deathmatch game mode. Can you even imagine how frustrating a 32 vs. 32 TDM game would be?

    HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 26 Thumb down 1
    • kelleroid
      August 20th, 2011 at 8:57 pm

      Maybe like Conquest 64 with everyone ignoring the flags and without tanks?

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 11 Thumb down 1
  4. ryan
    August 20th, 2011 at 7:22 pm

    Graphics over Gameplay

    Thumb up 1 Thumb down 50
    • His royal Fresshness
      August 20th, 2011 at 7:27 pm

      What are you trying to say?

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 11 Thumb down 2
      • kelleroid
        August 20th, 2011 at 8:58 pm

        Yet another weak attempt at trolling.

        HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 14 Thumb down 1
      • ryan
        August 20th, 2011 at 10:07 pm

        graphics over gameplay these days :|

        Thumb up 3 Thumb down 22
        • bloodysquad2
          August 21st, 2011 at 12:29 am

          Soo, MINEXRAFT has crap graphics and millions of people play it. Get your head straight.

          Thumb up 8 Thumb down 1
        • Dan
          August 21st, 2011 at 9:34 pm

          So your saying you dont like blending in with suroundings? Would you like to fire colored blocks?

          Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  5. Ain
    August 20th, 2011 at 7:25 pm

    I’m okay with that, of course I will only be playing Conquest and Rush anyway, since they’re by far the best modes.

    HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 14 Thumb down 4
    • Dan
      August 20th, 2011 at 8:15 pm

      I like them to i also enjoy onslaught.

      Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
  6. His royal Fresshness
    August 20th, 2011 at 7:27 pm

    Meh, no big deal

    Thumb up 3 Thumb down 2
  7. yams in a can
    August 20th, 2011 at 7:30 pm

    I’m glad they’re focusing the action. Squad Deathmatch was alright, but the map was sometimes 2-3 rush sections :X.

    Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
    • Baxter
      August 20th, 2011 at 10:50 pm

      Squad Deathmatch is 1 close quarters area from Rush. Can you name one thats 2-3?

      Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  8. MiKE_nz
    August 20th, 2011 at 7:31 pm

    Off topic: when do you plan on posting the rest of the multiplayer fact sheet?

    Also, curious to see how big the map size will be.

    Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
    • PaulC2K
      August 20th, 2011 at 9:28 pm

      I’ve been wondering about that too, mainly why the Weapon & Vehicle info is missing the specialisations, cos theres some interesting little bits on there IMO.
      Such as there being 7 types of Soldier specialisations, and Squad versions, meaning that speciailisation is assumingly given to everyone in the squad.
      Some co-ordination and you can go Ammo+, Armor/vest+, Pace+, suppression+
      or you could all go ammo and possibly gain very little (maybe quad ammo boost?)

      Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
      • [AOD] ۜDeathۜ_FĀŦĘ
        August 20th, 2011 at 10:52 pm

        Remember, no body armor and no magnum ammo, this isn’t Bad Company.

        Thumb up 0 Thumb down 3
  9. EnergySpike
    August 20th, 2011 at 7:35 pm

    This is lame. 32v32 team deathmatch with utter destruction on a huge urban or country map would be more than awesome. I’m buying a PC version not a console version, damn it DICE.

    Thumb up 3 Thumb down 12
    • Don'twhineaboutbf3
      August 20th, 2011 at 8:19 pm

      on all platforms meaning it will be like that on PC also

      Thumb up 5 Thumb down 2
  10. Jonny
    August 20th, 2011 at 7:37 pm

    you don’t need 32 v 32 deathmatch……… itd be chaos, spawn and you’d be killed from behind instantly and it would be far too chaotic

    besides, campaign is the way to go

    HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 10 Thumb down 2
  11. Death Bax
    August 20th, 2011 at 7:38 pm

    So Conquest and Rush will be the only 64 player game modes. I can deal with that. I always hated the Bradley in sqdm so no vehicles is a plus. I can’t wait to do some 12 man infantry teamwork with my fellow AoD members. I really want to see some Rush Karkand footage now.

    Thumb up 5 Thumb down 3
    • arekdbz
      August 20th, 2011 at 7:54 pm

      Rush is 32 players

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0
      • LogiQue
        August 20th, 2011 at 9:34 pm

        Karkand or Wake island.. :D :D

        Thumb up 2 Thumb down 2
        • Death Bax
          August 20th, 2011 at 11:00 pm

          Rush on Wake Island will be amazing and unique, but I can’t help but think a map with more destructible buildings would be more interesting to see.

          Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
      • Death Bax
        August 20th, 2011 at 10:58 pm

        Seriously? Only 32 in Rush? I can’t believe I missed that. So Conquest is the only 64 player game mode currently announced. I feel like only one is a bit of a wasted of ability. Lets hope for some brand new 64 player game modes. It’s not that big a deal to me though, Full bc2 pc rush games get choked up as it is.

        Thumb up 0 Thumb down 2
        • Phil
          August 21st, 2011 at 2:23 am

          Rush is nearly impossible as the attacking team with 16 defenders, and now you want 32 defenders?

          Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  12. Kalle
    August 20th, 2011 at 7:40 pm

    i dont know what to say if im happy or not but it hink im not happy since the vehicles are not in it.maps without vehicles feel way too cod like.like basra and sharqi in play4free and now engineers have no purpose since they cant repair anything or destroy anything so everyone will go assault and probably only 2 people in the whole team will use something else could of put in atleast a few lavs and tanks :/

    Thumb up 1 Thumb down 3
  13. dosx
    August 20th, 2011 at 7:59 pm

    idc about the 24 players but why no vehicles, WHY?!?!?!?!

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 9
    • NoFreakinIdea
      August 21st, 2011 at 1:28 pm

      WHY NO VEHICLES, WHY??!?!?
      because DICE is making good decisions, thats why ;)
      Glad it wont have vehicles.

      Thumb up 4 Thumb down 2
  14. Kalle
    August 20th, 2011 at 8:04 pm

    also i have a feeling that DICE is lying to us i dont think this is bf3 i mean come on.no commo rose,4 player squads,no commander,4 kits and now this.they are ruining good aspects of bf2 because now bf has also moved to consoles i wish bf was a PC exclusive.

    Thumb up 3 Thumb down 29
    • Don'twhineaboutbf3
      August 20th, 2011 at 8:22 pm

      wish in one hand and crap in the other

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 4
      • Kalle
        August 20th, 2011 at 8:32 pm

        no thanks im not interested in taking a dump in the hand my hot dog is currently resting on…

        Thumb up 3 Thumb down 5
    • maxbox99
      August 20th, 2011 at 9:21 pm

      Fuck off. Youre obviously crying for crying. I wont even argue…

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 6
      • LogiQue
        August 20th, 2011 at 9:55 pm

        you are brainwashed MAXBOX99 and it looks like you never played battlefield 2 im afraid. you have no idea how much they killed teamplay so far. They did it in BC2 and BF3 is more like BC2 if you cant see it means you are even more brainwashed you are type of person who will believe that red is actually blue if Dice would say so, but i have eyes and i can see. I’m a PC player and i see how much bf3 is dumped down so far. NOW go upstairs to your room! NO TV, NO LEGO, NO CONSOLE for two weeks!

        Thumb up 5 Thumb down 15
    • PaulC2K
      August 20th, 2011 at 9:38 pm

      If only they announced last week that Commo Rose was in (for PC) ;)

      As for 4 kits, theres not really much missing from the 6 kits that you cant achieve with 4. The only one i can think of is Spec-Op with his C4 and a carbine.
      That was a nice little combo, especially when there was Arti, command center and radar station to earn pts and weaken the oppo.
      THAT to me is a bigger loss (along with commander) than being told im one of 4 classes, rather than 6.

      It isnt BF2 though, people need to accept that. Yeah theres features we’d all like, but we’re not getting them it seems, instead we’ve got a load of new ones and some people still complain about the past rather than look forward to the future. We should all be thankful its not getting the COD treatment of just changing the number at the end of the title and releasing it.

      HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 14 Thumb down 0
    • LogiQue
      August 20th, 2011 at 9:38 pm

      AMEN! Agree with you my friend.. most of people here cant see it cause they know only bc series. There is one thing which is coming back and its: commo rose. better that than nothing.

      Thumb up 2 Thumb down 4
      • LogiQue
        August 20th, 2011 at 9:51 pm

        bf3 would be totally diffrent game if not fact that most of console players are still kids. EA/DICE are making money and they want to make as much as they can so they trying hard to satisfy all of us but its impossible. the worst thing is that PC players are the victims here. they choose to take some great features from the game in cost of better sales. if that make any sense :O

        Thumb up 2 Thumb down 12
        • ImStalkinYou
          August 20th, 2011 at 10:44 pm

          i think the reason they make bf3 more “console friendly” is because the Battlefield series has always been better than the Cocks on Duty series. the only thing cod is doing better, is the sales. for once, DICE is trying to compete with cod in the sale section too, and bf3 can be compared to cocks on duty: black cocks in pre-orders already.

          Thumb up 5 Thumb down 7
    • thebattlefield
      August 21st, 2011 at 3:22 pm

      there is a commo rose idiot

      Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
    • Dude
      August 22nd, 2011 at 6:43 pm

      If you want BF2, then play BF2. You won’t even have to wait for it to be released.

      Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
  15. Dan
    August 20th, 2011 at 8:18 pm

    Who agreee should there be points given to the winning side like 500-800 points for each person for completing the objective.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 3
    • LogiQue
      August 20th, 2011 at 10:27 pm

      I agree that they should go wuth old ranking system rather than that.. it was x2 for the winning team. 1 kill = 2 points. blowing up commander assets +1 point etc. that was fun but ofc they had to “fix” it :/

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
  16. Dan
    August 20th, 2011 at 8:30 pm

    This must be a picture from conquest because of the capture points

    Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
    • PaulC2K
      August 20th, 2011 at 9:40 pm

      very observant… although the heli is also a subtle hint ;)

      Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
      • Dan
        August 20th, 2011 at 10:48 pm

        Also his guns on full auto.. ;/

        Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  17. Alvatraust
    August 20th, 2011 at 8:33 pm

    This is awesome:)

    Now we can see how good people really are with there rifles.

    Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
  18. Tenzing
    August 20th, 2011 at 8:40 pm

    This is actually good. So if your a cod player you could stop whining about vehicles in the game and play that (while the Bf player will be playing rush and conquest).

    HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0
  19. BlueSmiley
    August 20th, 2011 at 9:04 pm

    I don’t care. I won’t be playing TDM on BF3 anyway.

    CONQUEST FTW.

    HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 9 Thumb down 1
    • Dan
      August 20th, 2011 at 9:24 pm

      Agreed

      Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1
  20. maxbox99
    August 20th, 2011 at 9:19 pm

    Where is that pic coming from??? New caspian border gameplay??? More??? I saw a 10 min offscreen leaked gameplay of gamescon. I would post the link but Im on a mobile device… Really easy to find on youtube…

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 3
  21. Bigman812
    August 20th, 2011 at 9:29 pm

    Who played TDM on a Battlefield game? Who cares if it’s 24 people? I’ll never play it. Conquest and Rush for me.

    Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1
  22. sayat
    August 20th, 2011 at 9:33 pm

    They did add commo rose Kalle.

    Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
    • fail trolls
      August 21st, 2011 at 9:14 am

      oh god thats good!

      Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  23. LS
    August 20th, 2011 at 9:59 pm

    so there is no diffrence between console and pc in TDM i suppose
    even if so post me and don’t make me buy the console version (plz ;p)

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 2
  24. Hatti
    August 20th, 2011 at 10:11 pm

    32v32 tdm would have been redicilus anyways. Glad they made it a 24p limit and without vehicles.

    Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  25. sgtmoody1944
    August 20th, 2011 at 10:18 pm

    Seems fair to me: it’s almost reminiscent of old Call of Duty games (e.g. the original Call of Duty) when it focused on tight infantry combat, no geographical objectives, and didn’t have all that killstreak crap. 12 vs. 12 without vehicles in a close quarters zone appears to be a good fit on paper. Heck, this might even convince more CoD fanboys to ditch that series and jump onboard the Battlefield bandwagon…for better or worse…

    HIGHLY RATED Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>